• Replies 1 reply
  • Subscribers 4 subscribers
  • Views 426 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Related Content

Where Do You Stand on Continuous Manufacturing?

Gabriela Mannino

At CPHI Frankfurt, I had the privilege of joining a panel of industry leaders to discuss the opportunities and challenges of Continuous Manufacturing (CM).
Opinions ranged from bold adoption to cautious skepticism - reflecting both efficiency gains and integration hurdles.

  • Pros: Faster cycle times, real-time quality control, agility for emerging modalities
  • Cons: Integration complexity, legacy infrastructure, ROI concerns

My take? CM is powerful, but it’s not one-size-fits-all. While it offers clear benefits - efficiency, quality, and supply chain resilience - the right approach depends on the product, process, and organization.

Where do you stand - and why?
Are you an adopter, a skeptic, or still on the fence? I'd love to hear you thoughts and share with the CMKC community! 

  • Hi Gabriala. I can fully support your perceived pros & cons of Continuous Manufacturing and during my recent Europe 360° Continuous Manufacturing Tour, I came across many of those misconceptions and in some cases deeply rooted beliefs about Continuous Manufacturing in our industry.

    Over the next few months, I’ll address these viewpoints one by one.

    Here is Misconception #1:

    “CM is not suitable for generics.” Really?

    As shown in the first tile from my series  , the truth is straightforward:

    ️It all comes down to the business case — productivity gained, cost of quality reduced, tech-transfer simplified, and regulatory pathways shortened.

    Let’s keep the conversation going. What misconceptions have you heard about CM?