Skip to main content
Prepare for an exciting September! Each week, we'll examine the latest trends in PAT, offering fresh insights straight from recent conferences. Your perspective matters, so we encourage you to share your thoughts as well. Stay informed, stay engaged, and let's explore these cutting-edge developments together. https://bit.ly/3Xw0X7k
18.118.226.10

Real-time feasible model-based crystal size and shape control of crystallization processes

By Szilagyi, Botond; Nagy, Zoltan K.

Published on CMKC

Abstract

The simultaneous control of crystal size and shape is particularly important in fine chemical and pharmaceutical crystallization. These two quantities influence the dissolution rate and bioavailability of final drug products, and also contribute to the manufacturability and efficiency of downstream operations. Numerous practical issues are associated with the implementation of an industrially relevant crystal size and shape control algorithm, such as the limited number of commercially available measurement devices and tight productivity constraints. Model-based control algorithm is required to address these problems, which, however, brings an additional challenge: the high computational demand of the applicable process simulation. In this work we show that the model predictive control, relying on measurements coming from routinely applied, commercially available process analytical technology (PAT) tools may be feasible. The algorithm is based on GPU accelerated full 2D population balance model (PBM) solution, which does not require external computation units (i.e. cloud computing). The state estimation, which is a crucial part of any robust model-based control system, is carried out by fitting the model, through the re-adjustment of some model parameters, on the measured FBRM count, PVM based mean aspect ratio (AR) and solute concentration, in real time. Artificial neural network (ANN) based soft-sensor is employed to simulate the most likely mean AR of the bivariate crystal size distribution (2D CSD) calculated by the PBM, which is compared then to the mean AR measured by the in-situ imaging tool, as a part of real-time parameter re-adjustment.

Journal

Computer Aided Chemical Engineering. Volume 46, 1, 2019, 1273-1278

DOI

10.1016/B978-0-12-818634-3.50213-7

Type of publication

Chapter Book

Affiliations

  • Purdue University, Department of Chemical Engineering

Article Classification

Review article

Classification Areas

  • Control

Tags